The Livable Communities Coalition

Working to improve Atlanta's quality of life through smart growth

A greater share of transit is a fair share for transit

Livable Communities Coalition executive director Ray Christman

A message from Livable Communities Coalition executive director Ray Christman:

Friday, August 12, 2011

Dear Members of the Metro Atlanta Regional Transportation Roundtable Executive Committee:

Fair Share for Transit applauds the Roundtable for already identifying transit projects totaling $3.6 billion on the current draft project list for Monday’s vote.  But we continue to urge you to push this number higher in order to more fully meet our region’s transit needs.

Please remember:

  • Next year’s sales tax referendum is the only opportunity on the horizon to fund much-needed – and much wanted – transit projects in our region.
  • Fair Share for Transit’s goal of $4 billion for transit represents just 25 percent of the total $16 billion expected to be spent on regional transportation in the coming decade.
  • $4 billion for transit can leverage $1.5 to 2 billion in federal matching funds that otherwise will not come to the region.

What needs remain?  The current draft project list:

  • Includes rail transit construction projects whose proposed funding falls short of cost estimates for full build-out, including the Clifton and Northwest corridors and high-capacity rail transit in the I-20 East Corridor (MARTA’s Heavy Rail Extension to Wesley Chapel Road is the current choice; Fair Share isn’t taking sides in the discussion over the merits of heavy rail to Wesley Chapel versus light rail from downtown to Candler Road).
  • Does not include worthy projects such as the downtown Atlanta to Griffin commuter line, leaving no transit commitments south of I-20 other than stretches of the City of Atlanta’s BeltLine and restoration of Clayton County bus service.
  • Leaves other worthy projects such as MARTA North Heavy Rail and the I-85 North Transit Corridor with seed money only.

From the outset, Fair Share has recognized the need to invest in roads as well as transit, but road projects have other funding opportunities.  Without TIA funding, on the other hand, transit has no plan for funding.  Advocates for projects not on Thursday’s $6.56 billion draft list are right to fear that if they don’t win a spot on Monday’s list, their chances for funding go away for another decade.  Monday is the day to seize the opportunity for transit projects that only TIA can make possible.

How can the Roundtable Executive Committee find the money to push transit spending to at least $4 billion while also reducing the entire project list to no more than $6.14 billion?  Through the careful reallocation or redirection of money dedicated to projects that have – or should have – other funding sources.  Consider, for example:

  1. Four proposed projects that are already on the region’s Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), which means that they have non-referendum funding identified.  The total potential “savings” is $78 million. (Please see first attachment or link here.)
  2. More than two dozen projects that were not identified as Plan 2040 “constrained” priorities.  The total cost of those projects is $461.9 million.  (Please see second attachment, column H.)
  3. More than 40 projects totaling more than $1.5 billion that involve interstate highways, U.S. highways, and state roads, all of which have access to state and federal funding.  Consider, for example, collector-distributor lanes for State Road 400 at $200 million and three grade separation projects totaling $135.9 million along State Road 316, where the state is already undertaking – at state expense – other grade separation projects.  The state could pick up a greater proportion of the cost of these projects, freeing up scarce TIA funds for other uses.   (Please see second attachment, columns I and J.)
  4. Projects with limited or no regional significance, remembering that the 15 percent set-aside that will go to counties and municipalities will generate substantial amounts to fund purely local projects.  Fulton, for example, can expect more than $22 million annually, Cobb more than $17 million. (See Page 3 in linked document.)

Fair Share does not suggest that projects in these categories aren’t worthy, only that they – unlike transit – already have or will have other sources of funding.

For road projects, the Transportation Investment Act of 2010 offers an alternative funding source.  For transit, it offers the only funding source.

On Monday, let’s send a strong signal to businesses, entrepreneurs, young professionals, residents, families and the world that the Atlanta region is serious about building an integrated transportation network.

Thank you for your hard work and many hours in service of our region.  We look forward to your vote on Monday.

Ray Christman

Executive Director, Livable Communities Coalition, on behalf of the 81 organizations united in asking for a Fair Share for Transit.


One response to “A greater share of transit is a fair share for transit

  1. Pingback: Fair Share for Transit urges Roundtable to add more transit projects to draft list | SaportaReport

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: